Best Advice, Worst Advice:
Why Good Writing Advice is Sometimes Bad

By Theryn Fleming (Beaver)

When it comes to writing advice, there's bad advice and then there's good advice that sometimes goes bad. Plain bad advice is easy to spot; it's the stuff that makes you roll your eyes or laugh out loud, as TC Editor Stephanie Lenz (Baker) did once upon a time at a "a public writers' get-together sponsored by a major magazine." Baker recalls: "The instructor spent ten minutes advising people on what font to use for manuscripts. She said that 'Lucida Handwriting' is on the 'acceptable' list of fonts to use for your manuscript. And I only remember that out of her bag of bad advice because it's where I laughed out loud and got dirty looks."

Bad advice is notable only for its wackiness; it's easy to identify and even easier to dismiss. Bad good advice is more complicated. This is the kind of familiar writing advice that does seem to have merit—if only because it's so frequently repeated—but at the same time may feel oppressive when you try to put into practice. You know the kind of advice I'm talking about—standard writing maxims like "write what you know," "eliminate adverbs," and "show, don't tell." Pervasive advice like this often feels like it's a rule rather than a suggestion. And therein lies the problem.

Beware of Always/Never Rules

The main difficulty with popular writing advice is not that it's inherently bad, but that it's presented as an absolute: you must always do this; you should never do that. Additionally, most of this advice has been boiled down to such pithy phrases that the meanings have often become unclear.

Always Good Advice

 

Thanks to everyone at the TC forums who helped with this article!

Final Poll Results

Home | Absolute Blank

integration-aboard
integration-aboard